Hypotheses about the (dis) agreement between artistic research and scientific research.
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Happily, artistic research has been accepted by academia in recent years and a beneficial relationship between art and science seems promising. Despite this, tensions and reluctance exist that obstruct the development of interdisciplinary projects where Art is involved. This paper will analyze and compare artistic research and scientific research in the light of four classic domains of Science Philosophy: language, mereology, method and truth; secondly, the article will articulate two hypotheses about the reasons for the disagreement between art and science, based on the division of rationalism and empiricism and, on the encounter possibility, based on the hypothetical use of reason, between the artistic and scientific research; two methodologically different views on the same concepts or metaphysical problems.
Downloads
Article Details
Index, revista de arte contemporáneo maneja sus derechos bajo licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0. En ese sentido los envíos quedan sujetos a la decisión del autor.
References
Ayer, A. J. (1952). Language, Truth and Logic, New York: Dover Publications.
Bachelard, G. (2006). A epistemologia. [L´épistemologie. Presses Universitaires de France. (1971)] (Trad. F. Godinho y M. Oliveira). Lisboa: Edições 70.
Borgdorff, H. (2012). The Conflict of the Faculties: Perspectives on Artistic Research and Academia. Leiden University Press, Amsterdam.
Borgdorff, H; Peters, P; Pinch, T. (Ed.) (2020). Dialogues Between Artistic Research and Science and Technology Studies. New York: Routledge.
Brewster, D. (1855). Memoirs of the Life, Writings, and Discoveries of Sir Isaac Newton. Volumen II, capítulo 27.
Calvino, I. (2010). Porquê ler os Clássicos [Perché leggere i classici. (2002)] (Trad. Cecília Andrade). Lisboa: Edições don Quixote.
De Laiglesia, J.F. (2003). Máquina para dibujar metáforas. Pontevedra: Diputación Provincial.
De Laiglesia, J.F. (2008). “Ideología institucional y carácter Autorreflejo del Arte” en De Laiglesia, J.F.; Caeiro, M. y Fuentes, S. Notas para una investigación artística. Pontevedra: Universidade de Vigo.
Eisner, E. (2005) El Arte en las Ciencias Sociales. Revista Enfoques Educacionales 7 (1): 81-91.
Eisner, E. (2008). Art and Knowledge en J. Knowles y A. Cole. Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples and Issues. (pp.3-12). London: Sage.
Fernández del Buey, F. (1991). Un experimento casi crucial para el debate contemporáneo sobre el método: James Watson describe el descubrimiento de la doble hélice en La ilusión del método. Barcelona: Crítica.
Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against the method. London: New left books.
Goodman, N. (1978). Ways of Worldmaking, USA: Hackett Publishing Company.
Hannula, M; Suoranta, J. and Vadén, T. (Eds.) (2005). Artistic research – Theories, methods and practices. Helsinki: Academy of Fine Arts, Finland and Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Henke, S; Mersch, D. et al. (eds.) (2020). Manifesto of Artistic Research. A defense against its advocates. Zurich: Diaphanes.
Ladyman, J. (2002). Understanding Philosophy of Science. London and New York: Routledge.
Lévy-Leblond, J-M. (2007) “La ciencia y el mundo, el arte y yo. Una entrevista a Lévv-Leblond”. En J. IBÁÑEZ. El Discurso Científico, los Conceptos Contrarios y la Perspectiva de Jean-Marc Lévy-Leblond. Recuperado de: www.madrimasd.org
Llopis Goig, R. (2008). La tercera cultura de Brockman. Revista A distancia, V. 23 (4), 169-175.
Macleod, K., (Ed.) (2013). Thinking through art: Reflections on art as research. New York: Routledge.
Markie, P. (2017) "Rationalism vs. Empiricism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.) Recuperado de https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rationalism-empiricism/
Marina, J. A. (1998). La selva del lenguaje. Introducción a un diccionario de los sentimientos. Barcelona: Anagrama.
Mersch, D. (2015). Epistemology of Aesthetics. Zurich: Institute for Critical Theory-Zurich University of the Arts and the Centre for Arts and Cultural Theory.
Michelkevičius, V. (2018). Mapping Artistic Research: Towards Diagrammatic Knowing. Vilnius Academy of Arts Press.
Moles, A. (1986) La creación científica. Madrid: Taurus.
Moraza, J.L y Cuesta, S. (2010) El Arte como criterio de excelencia. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación e Instituto de Arte Contemporáneo. Recuperado de https://sede.educacion.gob.es/publiventa/campus-de-excelencia-internacional-el-arte-como-criterio-de-excelencia/universidad-espana/14479
Morin, E. (1997). El método. La naturaleza de la Naturaleza. Madrid: Cátedra.
Morin, E. (2001). La mente bien ordenada. Barcelona: Seix Barral.
Newton, I. (2010). Princípios Matemáticos de Filosofia Natural [Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica (1687)] (Trad. J. Resina Rodrigues). Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
Popper, K. (1972). Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Popper, K. (1982). A teoria dos quanta e o cisma na física [Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics. London: Hutchinson], (Trad. Nuno Ferreira da Fonseca). Lisboa: Publicações Dom Quixote.
Prophet, J. (2011). El artista en el laboratorio: una cooperación razonablemente traicionera. Artnodes. Revista de Arte, Ciencia y Tecnología, nº 11, 39-44.
Ricoeur, P. (1980). La metáfora viva. Madrid: Ediciones Europa.
Schindler, J. (2018). Subjectivity and Synchrony in Artistic Research: Ethnographic Insights. transcript Verlag.
Schrenk, M. (2017). Metaphysics of Science. New York: Routledge.
Schwab, M. (2018). Transpositions: Aesthetico-Epistemic Operators in Artistic Research. Leuven University Press.
Snow, C. P. (1987). Las dos culturas y un segundo enfoque. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Vicente, S. (2003). Arte y Ciencia. Reflexiones en torno a sus relaciones. Huellas, nº3, 85-94.
Wilson, S. (2002). Information Arts. Intersections of art, science and technology. London: The MIT Press.