Artistic Ecosystems:

Actants, Tentacular Thinking, and New Materialities

Authors

  • cristina Santamaria a:1:{s:5:"es_ES";s:13:"independiente";}

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26807/cav.v10i19.641

Keywords:

Curaduría de arte, ontología, Atmósferas emocionales, telaraña, hábitat, materia, arte, naturaleza, araña, nido, percepción, prácticas transdisciplinarias, metodologías artísticas, Bioarte

Abstract

This article synthesizes the Ecos Vivarium graduation project developed at the School of Visual Arts – Curatorship Track – of the Universidad de las Artes de Guayaquil. It explores how contemporary curatorship has evolved beyond merely selecting and exhibiting works to become a space for knowledge production and interdisciplinary dialogue. Through the case studies of the exhibitions Ecos Vivarium and Todos los caminos llevan aquí (2024), the study examines the integration of living matter and emerging bioethical debates, emphasizing the agency of non-human actors. Drawing on theoretical frameworks from Haraway, Bennett, and Bal, the paper introduces a tentacular thought that interconnects diverse materialities and opens new interpretive possibilities. The article argues that the curatorial experience – by integrating space, image, and narrative – fosters the construction of open meanings and the transformation of artistic practices, thereby expanding the investigative capacities of art. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bal, M. (2002). Travelling concepts in the humanities: A rough guide. University of Toronto Press.

Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.

Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. Verso.

Coccia, E. (2018). El jardín del mundo. Editorial XYZ.

Fernández, M. (2017). Ethics, aesthetics, and the intersections of art and biotechnology. En D. J. Cox, E. L. Sandhaus, & P. A. Morton (Eds.), New media futures: The rise of women in the digital arts (pp. 85-100). University of Illinois Press.

Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.

Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.

Holbraad, M., & Pedersen, M. A. (2017). The ontological turn: An anthropological exposition. Cambridge University Press.

Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press.

Latour, B. (2012). An inquiry into modes of existence. Harvard University Press.

Lovelock, J. (1979). Gaia: A new look at life on Earth. Oxford University Press.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.

Rancière, J. (2009). The emancipated spectator. Verso.

Valdez, A. R. (2019). Paisaje/Territorio. Imaginarios de la selva en las artes visuales. Paralaje. https://www.paralaje.xyz/paisaje-territorio-imaginarios-de-la-selva-en-las-artes-visuales/

Orrala Suárez, Á., & Marangoni, L. (2008). Residencia Solo con Natura Limoncito 2008. Ministerio de Cultura. http://www.riorevuelto.net/2008/12/residencia-en-limoncito-guayas.html

Published

2025-07-01

How to Cite

Santamaria, cristina. (2025). Artistic Ecosystems: : Actants, Tentacular Thinking, and New Materialities. Index, Contemporary Art Magazine, 10(19), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.26807/cav.v10i19.641

Issue

Section

Art Themes

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.